Wednesday 25 January 2012

Shame's tragedy


A man in his own apartment having a shower after a nightstand.
The camera follows his naked body. 
Repetitive situation, repetitive scene.
His body, his computer with pornographic images and sexy video chat. 


The phone is ringing. It is Sissy, his sister calling to know about his brother.

They have a difficult relationship and their miss-understood love causes a lack of confidence and balance in their life. 
Sissy is a singer, self-harmed and unstable. Brandon is a successful thirthy-ish man with a strong sex addiction. He is not able to have a normal partner to love and share time together because he is not able to love. Mainly he doesn't love his self and his only source to be alive is sex. Brutal and physical sex with attractive prostitutes and anonymous encounters.
No feeling, no sensitive thoughts, no passion. Just shame.

In this film sex becomes the only way to communicate with the world, as working, as eating. It symbolises
a condition of human being in a post-modern world where people are not able to be happy, relax, managing their stress and problems.
Bodies without souls are the only survivors in a New York painted in grey, blue and dark colours, where everything is gone quickly, in a subway stop.  The City that never sleep is the perfect location for that distressing story. Clubs, drugs, sex and work are the main characters. And the subway underlining the busy and frenetic rhythm of life.

Brandon is selfish and introvert. He suffers from lack of love and his traumatic past and relationship with his sister has influenced whole his life. His behaviour.
Brandon is a desperate man seeking sex feedback in any place. His glacial eyes need love but they can see just ugliness.

Brandon and Sissy
When Sissy came to his place he can't accept her and all the time he is nervous and irritated. He forced her to go out, knowing she has mental problems and she is very fragile. After the last annoyed argument she tries to make a suicide.
Brandon feels guilty and cries under symbolic raining.
However we do not know if the purification is done. the last scene shows him in the subway looking a girl in ambiguous way. But he is still in his seat and does not have action. He is still alone.

Steve Mc Queen has made an amazing film with a particular use of camera in shallow deep focus. Photography is masterly and gives us the impression of emptiness in a full and frantic environment.
The camera is the fragmented view of Brandon, it is his metonymy.
The music is a mix of harmonic, rock and blues and it suits perfect to represent the psychological drama of the protagonist.

Friday 20 January 2012

Rules of Physic can explain social issues

Newton's Third Law of Motion says: For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

The London Mayor spoke yesterday about the "Pret a Manger phenomenon", referring to young unemployment in London. 


What do they have in common?


Both of them are saying the same thing, focussing  the reaction to something. The physic principle is adapted on young Londoners by Boris Johnson. He declared most of them are out work because of their lazy aptitude. They lack the "energy and appetite" for jobs, compared to foreign seekers. 


According to the Sun, UK unemployment this week hit a 17-year high of 2.68 million.


Tory Boris address what he called "the key problem for our economy" not to the city because "London is a fantastic creator of jobs, saying that there are around 30,000 job vacancies.
The reason that  many of "these jobs are going to people who don't originate in this country" is because British reaction to foreigners," hard-working, good people" He continued: "we need to learn from them and understand what it is that they have got that makes them able to get those jobs that young Londoners don't have."


The matter is the consequences of the huge immigration of young people from all over the world to Britain, mainly for education and job. They come here with strong motivation to change their life and deeper drive to success. They challenge themselves in the language and strongly compete to get what they want. They have to work hard to improve and go over the UK discrimination to them. It is not only will and  ambitions but mainly sacrifices, giving up fun and relaxation. 
It's really harsh, sometimes wearing. 


However young foreigners are investing lots of money and time in their project and it's unlikely they withdraw their proposals and doing less. Their aptitude is to push themselves to the end of the race and win. They definitely want a job and they will get it.     


Their deeper determination and tough action is balanced with an opposite reaction from Britons. Most of them develop less aspirations and desire to get a distinction. 
They are still in the "limbo " of mediocrity. Happy or unhappy is not a matter.
As the Major of London said young Britons lack courage, energy and appetite. The main problem for UK is to face that issues, which is the basic condition for a wealthy economy. 



Tuesday 17 January 2012

Thursday 12 January 2012

A controversial portait


Meryl Streep acting
“Watch your thoughts for they become words. Watch your words for they become actions. Watch your actions for they become...habits. Watch your habits, for they become your character. And watch your character, for it becomes your destiny! What we think we become. My father always said that... and I think I am fine.”
This is Margaret Thatcher. This is the Iron Lady, called by Soviet media in 1976 for her staunch opposition to communism.
This is the woman who changed the rules and the political mind in Britain.
She has the strong determination and the tough vocations to lead a country and facing challenges, believing the possibility of wealth is still in all the society but it need a severe measure to come out.
She aimed a society of “haves”, letting the ordinary people to do more and become better. She reinforced the British government. She lead and shift the Conservative Party, showing a male unparallel willing and power.
Her life was voted to the country. This her destiny. 

Speaking with her doctor about the illness, her words sound unquestionable and assertive. She is fine. 
After her brilliant career in public as one of  the best-known political figures in twentieth century, Margaret Thatcher starts suffering from dementia in her elderly. 

The film is set in the present, with Margaret as old lady, showing her speaking with her dead husband, coming back with memories about her ministry and her battles. She seems to not accept that she is alone now and out of any political games. She is struggling to have relax and peaceful feeling, staying awake late in the night and drinking.   
Her anxious and sad present recall vivid memories and events of her past, about her ministry, her achievements in politics and many battles she had to face, from the Falklands War to the Poll Tax riots and the Grand Hotel bombing. All her flashbacks include her beloved husband Denis who was part of her life and his big support and she can’t admit to herself that he passed away.
Her life was devoted to her public mission but her family was her backing and her strength, particularly Denis. Her son went to Africa and is still there, her daughter is helping her mum compassionately with worries for her shameful mental illness. 

Merlyn Streep has made a brilliant performance acting this difficult role, being a strong women over-prepared with a head man. She learnt how to lower and deepen her voice to become a credible candidate. 
 She wore blue dresses to go to the Parliament and act in her public life. At the end she left the scene in red, while her shoes where stepping with shoes on rose petals, as a mark of her strength in resignation unwanted. She decided to go out the politics with sorrow because she had lost the support and this harsh action made her more admirable. In her opinion “One of the great problems of our age is that we’re governed by people who care more about feelings than they do about thoughts and ideas” . She was interested in thoughts and ideas.
Meryln Streep has done a great job to fill the role. It was not easy for an American actress become the most important women in the UK. She has to study a lot how wearing that difficult dress.
Interviewed for the Daily Mail, she said: “I still don’t agree with a lot of her polizie. But I feel she believed in them and that they came from an honest conviction, and that she wasn’t a cosmetic politician just changing make-up to suit the times. She stuck to what she believed in, and that’s a hard thing to do…She’s still an incredibly divisive figure, but you miss her clarity today. It was all very clear and up front, and I loved that eagerness to mix it up and to make it about ideas.”



The husband Denis, played by Jim Broadbent, is a funny presence. Actually he is just a ghost because he is dead but his personification in the house is real and relevant for Margaret. He was her true love, instead of her ambitions he was so stay back to her always and without any reservations. He excepted Margaret as she was as supported.

The Iron Lady, directed by Phyllida Lloyd and written by Abi Morgan is delicate human story. Charles Moore described this film as “a poem of the triumph and the tragedy” of a great personality who believe that politics was about thoughts that lead to actions.
The film inspires some reflective questions on current issues amid the economic crisis. The unemployment is just one example as a  big and critical problem present also today but it needs different way to be addressed.
"I think the important thing is in these debates we are having about executive pay... about the economic situation for young unemployed people particularly, is that we don't repeat the mistakes that were made in the 1980s when Margaret Thatcher was prime minister." said Danny Alexander, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury from Lib Dem.
However he added that the Baroness Thatcher had done "many good things for this country" .

Newspaper and Media are divided and careful on judging and reviewing the film. However many of them show concens. 
The Guardian has claim the film is the transformation of “a poor Margaret Thatcher into biopic drag queen”. It remains a controversial portrait of the vulnerability and decline of Baroness’s Thatcher. It can being a distressing portrait that shoe the loneliness, mental illness of a fragile old lady what “was used to trying to do something” and now is just “trying to be someone”.

The film can upset many Tories and conservative supporters of the government.

According to the BBC, the Former Conservative minister Lord Hurd has called the film "ghoulish" and the former party chairman Lord Tebbit said the prime minister he had known was never the "half-hysterical, over-emotional" woman portrayed by Meryl Streep. Conservative MP Rob Wilson has concern on the "intrusive and unfair" representation and has called for a House of Commons debate.  He said: "It left me wondering about the humanity of the film makers who are very subtly denigrating someone who was a great prime minister.”

Meryl Streep has a different opinion, she said to the Daily Mail: “If you think that debility, delicacy, dementia is shameful; if you think that the ebbing end of life is something that should be shut away; if you think that people need to be defended from those images — then yes, if you think that it’s a shameful thing. But I don’t think that. I have had experience with people with dementia. I understand it, but I think it’s natural”.

 The PM David Cameron commented the portrait by Meryl Streep as "a fantastic piece of acting", but it has been made "another dayr day"' because there is more about her fragile situation than focusing on what she has done has a prime minister. The story is set in the present, in the tragic illness of their on lady, with flashbacks to her past during her premiership. But this is just a film and has its angle, right or wrong is not a matter in a creative filmmaking. Cinema is a point of view on the world, on something. It is a representation made by her director and nothing more. A personal and relative true that can be criticised.

The Iron Lady is an impressive and courageous portrait of the Margareth Thatcher, well acting and well written, but is still controversial. The question can be about the timing but mainly about the protagonist.  She was a great woman with iron force and determination that no many has, she was an hero. And all big names have done good and bad things to run a country. This is not an easy job. 



Friday 6 January 2012

Russian invasion in London High Streets

During the gloomy Christmas and following sales lasted from  the Boxing day, Britons are still reluctant to spend money on shopping amid the economic crisis. The priorities are others: health, food, rent and mortgage and at least education. It seems shopping comes at the bottom. 

Who is buying in this bleak time? 

The answer is quite well known already. 
The top buyers are Russian.  

According to the Metro, the high-end department store Selfridges reported a 20 per cent increase of Russian people in Christmas shopping compared with last year. 

Everyone knows the power and wealthy of Russia. Nothing compares with us. The rich Ruskies are seriously rich. They went in the most expensive restaurants and hotels and buy lots of luxurious good in the High Streets, without thinking the amount of money they are spending freely. They have no limits. 

I remember this summer a news about some Russian went to the Club Billionaire  in Sardinia and "through away" thousands of euros on champagne and alcohol. In many other clubs in Milan the situation is the same, with many beautiful Russian girls staying out over the night drinking, after all the day spent on shopping in Monte Napoleone and via della Spiga. 

In London Russia is solving the recession buying what the citizens can't affort. Russian are used to go for designer clothes, bags and shoes and jewellery. 

Shopping on top brands is so important for them because it is related with their meaning and value of their wealthy culture. 
A spokesmen for Selfridges said that this "big shopping" is all about keeping up appearances and exclusivity in their social circles. "Wearing  the latest styles from the big fashion houses is very important to them". 
Showing off is required to be considered up to date and well established in their society. 

We can judge them as materialistic people and maybe they are. But this is our culture. Russia is Europe but it is still  Easter world and their history is quite different from West with long experienced liberalism and  democracy. 

At the end all of us have to  recognise the incredibly importance Russia has in our bleak economy at the moment. 
Good or bad importance can be discussed. 
British luxury brands could survive also thanks to them and they will continue to sell expensive goods that the majority of the population can just look out of the shop-mirrors.